What Is Technical Debt in Scrum

Video Version Of This Article

Audio Version Of This Article

More or less, it requires a Scrum Master to cultivate a climate where a client places an order for the work into the product backlog, and the team of the Scrum transforms it into an increment of significant worth.

Software developers using agile strategies to code often prefer to use Scrum strategies to build extremely complex software products. Dealing with technical debt in Scrum is a challenge that all coding technicians face during the Sprint.
Scrum is getting popular with every single passing day as the most widely used agile coding technique. It is a combination of practices, standards, and coding conventions in iterative procedures to produce the best coding results in a sprint. But the question is still there.

How can such an exuberant process result in the instance of creating technical debt? To answer this question, first, find out how Scrum works?

How Scrum works in Agile network

Think of Scrum as a simpler structure that delivers the best results. It helps individuals, groups as well as associations in providing versatile answers for really complex coding tasks. It makes it possible to convey beneficial and innovative results that worth beyond expectations. More or less, it requires a Scrum Master to cultivate a climate where a client places an order for the work into the product backlog, and the team of the Scrum transforms it into an increment of significant worth.

Sprint is the decided timeframe to finish the project that is allocated to the Scum team as well as prepare its review. It starts with arranging a joint meeting that includes team members, facilitators, and the owners of a project along with the Scrum Master. They together concur upon precisely what work will be refined during the Sprint. They decide how much work can reasonably be refined during the Sprint, while the owner of the project has the last say on what standards should be met for the work to be endorsed and acknowledged.

The scum works in repeated splints that progressively reach towards the completion of the project. Each splint completes the output from a specific backlog provided by the client.

Usually, a sprint endures a week or 30 days. The length of a sprint is jointly decided by the scrum master and the client or owner of the project. When the group agrees on how long a sprint should last, all future sprints ought to be something similar.

Technical Debt in Scrum

Scrum engages software makers in the form of a team. The whole team focuses on a single goal of making a final product that is all set to be promoted or delivered to the end-user or owner. The individual team members work closely, discus, and interact to get the best possible solution, following the instructions from the scrum master in the form of scrum rules. The scrum master makes sure that the backlog provided by the owner or customer is best utilized in a coordinated manner by the team.

Technical Debt In Scrum

Who is responsible for managing the Technical Debt in Scrum?

Not only the Scrum Master but the whole team is responsible for managing the technical debt in the whole development project. The Scrum Master makes it feasible for the group members to self-arrange and switch from one technique to another when required. His duty is to facilitate the interactions of all the team members for smooth functioning and unified results.

As with every ordinary software project, Scrum projects have a possibility of technical debt if short cuts or less viable coding practices are employed. The nature of the Scrum allows coordinated functioning by the members of the team. Therefore, the whole team should focus on using quality coding, keeping in view the basic framework of their project.

Truly speaking, there is no single rule or set of practices that work well for all Scrum projects. Below, we have sorted certain recommendations for managing the technical debt in Scrum:

  1. The components of the projects provided by the customer may contain deficiencies and errors. These prove to be the source of debt and will make further coding of the project harder. The team needs to highlight these debts in each backlog and come to a unified plan to minimize these.
  2. Declare technical debt issues more transparently during every meeting right from the start. The Scrum initiates with the backlog list provided by the owner of the project. At the end of every Sprint, the status of the technical debt should be highlighted in the review. The team members should have a clear understanding of the goodness of coding that is already done.
  3. The whole team should make a norm to pay off the technical debt during the Sprint. The team should allocate a good percentage of time and effort in dealing with issues related to bugs and errors. Every Sprint should be given equal time and effort to refactor for achieving the least level of debt.
  4. To minimize the technical debt efficiently, it is vital to have an estimate. Technical debt ratio is a tried and tested approach to get an idea of how much debt is present in the project each time the team reviews the code.
  5. The scrum team should be aware of the standards to achieve and the status of technical debt on each backlog they are working on. Every project has a varying quality requirement as per coding. The quality standards to achieve in each backlog of a project are also different.
  6. The goal of Scrum should be to keep track of the technical debt and keep it at a point where it is manageable in the long run. Once the team agrees that the technical debt is on the optimal level where the code quality is not compromised, the Sprint should be announced as completed.

Technical Debt and Scrum — The Scrum Guide

Begin with Scrum ideas — bravery and availability are in the minds — that contribute to disclosure and the inherent control as well as the main branch from Scrum. The Scrum Guide purposefully discusses the problem of the technical debt liable for enhancing communication and self-government.

As per the Scrum Guide:

●     Proprietor verifies that its development team's efforts are maximized.
●     This is completed by controlling the project backlog, that is, the evidence in the content of that project backlog and that order.
●     The Product Backlog is the only subset of specifications that the team of Developers will concentrate on, and it will cover everything that the system requires to be advantageous.
●     This is finished through monitoring deliverables, which is apparent in the deliverable items and arranging them.
●     The team of Scrum never jeopardizes quality.
●     The engineering team or the Technical Team specifies what counts as "completed."
●     When additional data is gathered, the development crew adds further components to Sprint Backlog, if applicable.
●     The Project Owner evaluates Project Backlog entries that seem to be committed to attaining the Sprint Goal during Sprint Planning.
●     Once the developing crew advances the sense of "completed," the existing production milestones will have to be redesigned.
●     The project deliverables, nevertheless, are specified exclusively to attain the Sprint benchmark by the developer side.

How is the Scrum team dealing with technical debt?

The whole Scrum squad should emphasize coping with technical debt. In addition to creating this method more supervised, there exist numerous attempted and accurate methods.

Cling on to the technical liabilities. Generate a picture of the existing technical burden, so everyone realizes the situation of coding foundation consistently. Furthermore, minimize redundancies in Sprint: Sprint To alert investors about the prevailing application status, audit events on a routine basis.

Evaluate technical insolvency through code measurement, including intricate cyclomatic, code coverage, SQALE assessment, and violation of standards. There are a plethora of ways for this purpose.

Evaluate technical insolvency through code measurements, particularly sophisticated cyclomatic, code generation, SQALE assessment, and transgressions of rules. There are indeed a plethora of ways for this objective. Generate an absolutely small portion of defects.

Make sure that perhaps the project schedule includes all of the chores related to the treatment of updates and upgrades - Scrum has no cabinet bookkeeping.

Adopt an experimental procedure that periodically induces scope creep to speed up growth in a crucial field.

Adapt the 'Finished' approach to product quality proposition, for illustration, outlining thresholds of software reliability that prevents system failures long-term sustainability.

How to deal with Technical Debt in Scrum?

Software developers seem to have a close understanding of engineering debt buildup but experience ineffectual and therefore unable to convey why the emphasis should be given to intellectual debts. Rather, the organizations expect that perhaps the inclusion of functionality is somewhat more crucial than the preservation of the infrastructure. Four practical methodologies have been implemented in the system to render Technical debt transparent and empower organizations to easily stabilize code coverage with unique updates.

Use impressive analogies

The expression 'technical debt' is a crucial phenomenon. Use it like that. For individuals who aren't really hackers, the hacking conclusion is  not only vague but also unfathomable; it "needs to actually facilitate us immediately but is to hinder us someday." They have no feasible intellectual pattern.

Allegories are wonderful resources for comprehension. This paradigm is 'technical debt'. When programming has gradually turned a pledge to expand, the technical debt commits to incentivizing it afterward.

Before uncovering, one will waste hours negotiating with interests. Interest is indeed the time for mechanical debt to pay to bear the burden of the inherited technical debt. All codes might tough to comprehend and alter, defects and vulnerabilities. We may have technical debt or accompanying interest, but quite often, we are not.

Assumes liability

Numerous software developers believe they have always been the hostages of the approach "the company" emphasizes new techniques to enhance the coding base while flaws, defective code, and technical debt consequences are blamed on the firm. No benefit can be done by the development team.

One vital phase is to quit playing the hostage card. Handle the code coverage as a unit. It's not reinforced by design in the Scrum Guide. Assure that every projection the crew provides is needed to generate sufficient code. If possible, broaden the theory of completion with technical debt combat criteria. Consider creating technical debt a portion of the manufacturer of the product, consumers, and the business speech. But you should be solid on your desires.

Use metrics for coding

Metrics include an enormous possibility to give much more empirical and genuine, arbitrary and mystical. It also establishes a tangible goal for improvement. Sometimes it's tough and unpolished; this is no cause to evacuation. These measures help humans to understand the accuracy of the analysis and inform their judgments about the impact of technical debt—parties who check the Sprint retrospective indicators likely to robust.

Eliminate the technical debt of the product

Don't really cover up the technical debt of the business proprietor or consumers. Analyze when need, anticipate and implement additional modifications like repute, adjustments, and productivity enhancement to put most in a product backlog. Indulge assets inside sprint backlog like other commodities; divide huge components, and encourage the user of the commodity to obtain them. The decision-maker also agrees, as per the developer, that technological obligations may be tackled for a certain length of the period in a sprint. This is an approach that puts anyone beyond the software development team at risk of opaque technical debt. Make sure elements for enhancements are generated and presented mostly on the Scope statement throughout the sprint review.


While many companies are implementing Scrum to add high value to their projects, the formation of technical debt is still not out of the question. No matter how efficient the teams are performing, the key to managing debt is clearly defining and keeping the status of debt transparent.

The whole team should exert unified effort on understanding, measuring, and paying off technical debt in each splint of the project. The debt report should be an essential part of the Splint reviews and should be dealt with on a priority basis.

Considering addressing a dilemma in a particular paradigm constantly leads to fresh qualifications and competence to uniform existing verdicts, technical debt is inherent.

It, therefore, requires a concession in dealing with technical debt. The long-term ambition of organizational versatility cannot be attained by a showcase manufacturer with additional features. For instance, a consumer's additional components seem to have no versatility.

Correspondingly, the administration of technical debt in Scrum is an obligation of the Team member itself, thereby illustrating the integrated safeguards of Scrum.

Updated on June 4, 2021