Code Review Checklist

Audio Version Of This Article

Code reviews are a challenging area for a large number of groups. Even though groups realize that code reviews are often anticipated, it is tricky to save these operations. In addition, code reviews are frequently sometimes had to establish the subjective judgment of everyone in a designated area that results in conflicts, feelings damaged, and mistrust in a squad.

It is impossible to handle once the contempt of your team begins. There's going to build animosity. There is a lack of trust‚ÄĒdeclines motivation. The efficiency of code is liable to be affected. That is why your crew require to succeed if you have such an honest approach in your code reviews.
So how can quantitative code reviews be done? I advocate that you utilize a checklist.

Why Do You Have To Use A Checklist?

Code reviews must yield modifications. If they hadn't, they would not do so. It might prompt to some very severe problems with code reviews. So take a rambling discussion in quest of a modification.

By utilizing a criterion, the evaluators would adhere to the essential points and discover the relevant adjustments. Checklists also assist developers in not forgetting anything. The evaluators can keep to what is vital and discover what modifications are crucial by utilizing a checklist. In addition, checklists enable evaluators to ensure that nothing vital is skipped.

When Are You Supposed To Use A Checklist For Code Review?

A checklist may be an instrument you create to assist your functional testing, or it may be more common practice throughout the organization. In any case, both the coder delivering the revised code and the person conducting the revise can utilize a checklist.

It is vital that the code is prepared for audit and a checklist permits the code reconsideration and a more fair view of its code before transmitting it to the critic. I would go so far that the developer can gain more from a checklist than the reviewer.

Things May Be Resolved Prior To The Actual Code Review

Far too few factors have to be deemed into deliberation until a code review is conducted. But those are strategies each community or CTO involves to deliver regarding the completion of the initial manuscript of the code.

Prior to actually starting the code review phase, identifying the regulatory criteria is very crucial. The crew must design certain measures to be pursued during the evaluation. In addition, it is pertinent to briefly record the expectations of firmware about achievement, techniques, infrastructure, and the outcome.

Finally, you must also calculate the opportunity to reflect all the checks before starting the code audit. Two significant factors why programmers neglect it are the moment and period involved in commencing the code review. While you don't want to skip a certain procedure, better to hope you very often generate more important checks before audits that would not substantially add to software modules are formed. Since you're not long enough, the code will now answer significant difficulties, which may not cause considerable trouble.

Code Review

Preparation Of Code

All programmer must inspect their code for basic error before each code review course, ensure that adequate assessments would be presented for automatic review, and validate that their response will occur as per the appropriate guidebook. Receive the last iteration of the code in a designing phase and enjoy the server to examine every latest section of data after acceptance using a series of regression testing already developed.

The evaluator should only begin to review unless the code retrieved easily these checks.

Where To Begin?

However, you could question how you can begin. "Everything smells lovely, but how can I understand whether or not it's on the chart?"
To provide it, move forward and develop a checklist for novices. The elements you desire to be included in any code which you have already examined. Consult directly to this list when you evaluate the code you examine and reimburse special attention to it. Fill up the chart. Detach from its stuff. Throughout time, tweak it.

Distribute it to the group when you've utilized the checklist periodically. Don't knock it back or dictate someone's abdomen. Just discuss it with you as a reference. Your coworkers will improve and enhance it to contribute your unique ideas. You will struggle with some issues, but you may enjoy it and utilize it if you reckon about it and stay on top of it.

Once everybody gets it, you'll send it. Consider it a Google Doc, which any code review features before every developer. Ensure it is connected to the boarding manuals of your staff. Quarter the struggle is about ensuring that everyone understands when and where the checklist exists.

During A Code Review, Factors To Look For

What Not To Do:

‚óŹ ¬† ¬† Design
‚óŹ ¬† ¬† Code review is a tactic for perusing and learning from current code and not the moment and spot to debate implementation concepts. Instead, put them aside simultaneously and consult individuals beyond the examination of the code if functional prototypes spring to the psyche.
‚óŹ ¬† ¬† Creating code
‚óŹ ¬† ¬† You don't review whether you write any code. So a slight indentation of two principles in a remark might be the lone oddity to express a fault or a proposed remedy.


Code review is an attempt for everybody to develop and master code whilst still enhancing the public code. We all perform poorly, and we can always learn. Code defects are a chance for all of us to thrive.


‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Seek for bugs
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†No privilege control, NPEs, etc.
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Establish a standard style of coding
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Acquire excellent script and better ¬†procedures

Checklist Of Base Code Review

Let's swing through the fundamental code review checklist, which may come in helpful if you're new to code evaluations or throughout the first code review audit.

Ask yourself these fundamental questions when examining the code:

‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Could I certainly grasp the code?
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Is the script constructed in accordance with the coding criteria?
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Is the code over twice reproduced?
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Could I quickly discover the causative factors of node test/debug code?
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Is it too massive a feature or class? If so, does the role or style have all these projects?
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†You could indeed suggest/ propose modifications to the code if you think that the response to either of the usual issues is insufficient
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Evaluation of Specialist Code
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Let's examine what a professional code evaluator is thinking. This is the checklist of specialist code revisions
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Pursues code usual instructions
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Salesforce Naming Convention
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Salesforce code patterns and readability
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Maintain your techniques
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Don't repeat a similar mistake.
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Methods should utilize one thing alone.

Is Code In Accordance With Defined Architecture?

1.   Executive order: Be mindful of the execution order.

2.   Framework for occurrence processing and logging: Take a glance into the logging framework.

3.   The Framework trigger is appropriately incorporated.

4.   Is the code in line with the non-functional need?

5.   Is the Scalable code allowing a large user base?

6.   Does hug data accept performance?

7.   Is safety taken into consideration?

8.   Can the code be readily preserved?

9.   Apex best practices: If feasible, click on the code.

1.   Do not use Hardcode IDs

2.   Check your code for Loop No DML/SOQL

3.   Creating an object trigger

4.   Best Practices Apex test class

‚Ė† ¬† ¬†Write significant tasks with statements

‚Ė† ¬† ¬†One claims via technique.

‚Ė† ¬† ¬†Follow the development of Test-Driven.

‚Ė† ¬† ¬†Concentrate on 100% code coverage

‚Ė† ¬† ¬†Writing evaluation criteria for vast data collections verification

‚Ė† ¬† ¬†For data generation, use TestDataFactory.

10. Use the Query Map

11. Use of the restrictions Apex methods to circumvent restrictions on the Governor

12.OOAD ( Object-Oriented Analysis & Design)

1.   Dividing concerns

2.   Youth Dust Protocol

3.   SOLID principle

‚Ė† ¬† ¬†Principle of single liability: Is code in accordance with planned architecture? Executive action: Be mindful of the execution order. Framework for anomaly processing and logging: Stare into the logging framework. The Framework trigger is appropriately instated.

‚Ė† ¬† ¬†Open-closed doctrine: "Software entities must be open to expansion, but closed to amendment."

‚Ė† ¬† ¬†Correlation abstraction doctrine: "Abstract sequences rather than realities."

‚Ė† ¬† ¬†Injection Dependency

13.         Static Code Analysis: Use the device to prevent code scrutiny from getting up too much time.

14.         Patterns and practice guidelines for integration.

Opinion Of Intellectuals

‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Would you assume the code must be reviewed by a specialized professional, such as a security or accessibility expert until it is executed?
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Will this adjustment affect several groups? Would you also be given an opinion on the modification?
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Well, this is it.
You gazed at and considered the most critical problems. Kudos!
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†One of the activities I make in my masterclasses for code review now is to revisit the code review checklist with participants by rebutting two theories:
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†What sections of the checklist might you be interested in?
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Whether the portions appear you to ignore?

So, What Are The Critical Review Tips For The Code?

When you are preparing your code for your first peer review or ready to ignore others, remember this to make the most of your time with the crew:

Learning together. Many software developers have been involved in the system for at least some love, so a better method may be energized or a time-saving shortcut. As a learning experience, use your time together as a crew.

Try to prevent the unfavorable opinion including its "examination of the code." Unless you concentrate on key findings and great things your team has done, the code review is an opportunity for the general section to share love and enterprise approaches. Create scenarios in which every individual learns something.

Then What About Formats And Criteria Of Coding?

Perhaps just you recognized which ensures that the code will learn the usual coding pattern during this experiment. Isn't that noteworthy, therefore?

Narrow reply: crucial. The only path that achieves uniformity in a programming base is through perovskite regulatory guidance. And consistent unit tests are speedier, allowing individuals to move assignments and preserving your codebase legible and bearable quickly.

Google is an excellent illustration of this freedom. And this really facilitates Google to examine for a unique code on routes and schedules.

Utilize the mentally prepared script formats for several Google languages.

The policies and procedures should always be laid out, but ensure it is executed and get it over with.

Automate The Automated

However, when you have determined how your software platform must appear, invest the time to set up and create tools correctly, but you need to push a button to access the script.

You should be doing a bunch more, too. To liberate your sentient protocol respondents, employ deterministic analytical techniques. The extraordinary effort is worthwhile.

Be Polite, Compassionate, And Modest

The integrity of the input from the code review isn't really determined according to what users assume as well as by how individuals admit that too. Sure, if it is not carefully expressed, modest and polite, the best code review feedback seems to be practically nothing. Put their responses mostly in form of proposals rather than requests.

Best Practices For Code Review

‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Expedite utilizing PMD or other solutions even more than feasible
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Consider its objectives of the test environment
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†While posting a review, follow a standard checklist
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Answer quickly
‚óŹ ¬† ¬†Swiftly settle its analysis

Fundamentals Of Object-Oriented Analysis And Design

Below are some inspections which can increase the efficiency of your code. Recall most of these criteria will be based primarily on your task, and some have reverse interactions whether the other becomes vacant unless users adopt one.

The premise of OOAD is:
Central place philosophy: Each object must have one feature throughout a class or approach.
Interactive Shuttered Premise: When additional features were implemented, prior script will not be changed.
Liskov Principle of Sustainability: This same concept of its main program must not be changed by a local variable.


The code review checklist here wasn't complete as well but gives the reviewer guidance for successful code evaluations and excellent code delivery. The code from different points of view would first require some practice to analyze. However, code observers could undertake efficient code reviews without enough work and time after some practice. This Code Review Checklist is an excellent starting point if you'd like to be a competent code reviewer.

Updated on September 1, 2021